Even though
their training methods are absolutely not my cup go tee, as it is too compliant
were anything is possible since it lacks oppositional training, many of their
videos have a lot of interesting things to offer, I like what I see but don’t like
how it’s done.
This has
tremendous value depending on how you look at it, I have chosen to get
inspiration and use it as another view as many of their techniques are similar
to what I teach, but as I teach with 90% opposition and 10% specific technical
training, so all I need to do is train the techniques and then see if it can be
done in oppositional training and sparring.
One huge
misconception in some clubs is that some techniques do not work as they have
tested it in sparring, but I know a HEMA (European medieval combat) club that
use that as a yardstick to chose what is efficient or not, the head instructor
has only had 3 nights of training 4,5 hours total before instituting himself as
an expert in European medieval combat by reading old books, that would be the equivalent
to have trained any system 3 times and after reading books from an age where
the structuring of the text to pass on information was IMO very lousy, and name
yourself as an expert of that style of combat. There are depictions from
medieval times but not in sequence, you have to read and in some cases guess
how they reached from start to end as there is only one drawing for the
technique.
The problem
is when amateurs who appoint themselves as experts, it is most likely that the
reason why they cant execute certain techniques is because they have not
reached a high enough skill level or have not trained it properly and failed. The
easiest way to blame the errors is by choosing that it’s the techniques inadequacy
and not their own lack of skill and training, and use it for deciding what the
high% techniques are.
No comments:
Post a Comment